![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Considerations for Protective Playground Surfacing
By: Jeromy Morningstar Having spent the past 12 years in the playground industry, I have become a strong believer in promoting the outdoor classroom as a means to encourage free play. I think Albert Einstein put it best when he said, "Play is the highest form of research." A well-designed playground strikes a balance between components that are inclusive to varying abilities while also providing sufficient challenge, which is essential to promoting physical development and building self confidence. A fundamental aspect of any playground design must also be its ability to challenge within a safe environment. Unfortunately, and in spite of our best efforts, the very nature of children's play makes falls to the surface inevitable. It is estimated that more than 70 percent of playground injuries are due to falls to the surface. How often have we seen children using play equipment in a manner inconsistent with its original design intent? In light of this, it is a wonder that protective surfacing options remain one of the most overlooked and under-evaluated aspects of playground design. Playground surfacing is as diverse as the equipment placed upon it. The many different types of surfacing available can be generally broken down into two main categories consisting of loose fill and unitary materials. There are many loose fill materials in use today such as wood chips, pea stone, sand, bark mulch, rubber mulch and engineered wood fiber (EWF). Of this group, engineered wood fiber is the dominant surfacing type, comprising of approximately 75 percent of the market by volume. Engineered wood fiber offers the user a number of advantages. The primary advantages are cost and fall protection ratings. EWF offers one of the lowest initial purchase costs. EWF also provides one of the most favorable initial fall protection ratings when tested in laboratory conditions. Additional advantages include ease of installation, conformance to ASTM F1951 (wheelchair accessibility) and adequate resistance to flammability (rate of flame spread). However, EWF also provides a number of disadvantages, including requiring a regular maintenance program to counter the effects of decomposition, compaction and material displacement. The second category, unitary surfacing, consists of two major types of products including poured in place (PIP) and prefabricated mats or tiles. Poured in place (PIP) surfacing is a dual density system consisting of a resilient base mat and a higher density top wear course. PIP consists of a combination of recycled and newly manufactured rubber mixed with polyurethane binding resins. As the name implies, the PIP system is mixed, leveled and finished on site by specially trained installation personnel representing the manufacturer. PIP surfacing offers many functional advantages, including low maintenance and low life-cycle costs. Since the material is unitary in nature, extensive maintenance is not required in order to maintain consistent fall protection and wheelchair mobility. Additional advantages unique to PIP include the ability to conform to irregular shapes and grade changes within the playground. Graphics can also be incorporated into the surface adding play value. There are also several limitations inherent to the PIP system. The highly valued designs that the surface is capable of offering can be susceptible to damage caused by environmental factors. Since this product is manufactured at the installation site, inconsistencies can develop during the installation process. Another unitary surfacing option that is growing in popularity is a prefabricated product often supplied in a mat or tile form. These materials are generally made from a combination of recycled and newly manufacture red rubber combined with a polyurethane resin. Unlike PIP, which is field manufactured, this product is compression molded in a manufacturing environment prior to being shipped to the playground for installation. Pre-manufactured products offer the same functional advantages that field-manufactured unitary surfaces offer in that they do not require a high level of maintenance, thus providing a comparatively low life-cycle cost. Pre-manufactured products are seen to offer several additional advantages, including cost, consistency and durability. The cost of a tile system generally falls between PIP at the higher end and engineered wood fiber at the lower end of the cost scale. Although both tile and PIP are generally made with the same types of raw materials, the cost savings are realized in production efficiencies, lower installation costs as well as the longevity of the pre-manufactured product. Disadvantages of tile systems include tile to tile separation, limitation in free-flowing graphic design potential, and stringent requirements for base preparation. The makers of synthetic surface materials are making significant strides in developing a variety of products that are both attractive and impact absorbing. Advances in manufacturing technologies are fueling the process, providing opportunity for better products to be developed more efficiently and more economically. The result of ongoing manufacturing developments is a greater variety of choice for designers and owner/operators of playground facilities. Technical advances have also led some suppliers to ensure greater ease and precision of installation, the elimination of expansion and contraction problems, and product durability over time. Ultimately, though, regardless of which type of playground surfacing meets your particular needs, it is important to remember that the quality of a system can vary significantly from one manufacturer to another. In order to ensure that your surfacing product exceeds in the critical performance categories, the following questions should form an integral part of your product inquiry. 1. Does my surface comply with current ADA standards? One important component of an accessible playground is the surface. By default, most unitary surfaces automatically meet this requirement. Although some loose fill materials also meet the requirement, many others do not. Particular attention should be given to this requirement when investigating a loose fill option. 2. Does the surface meet the latest standard for impact attenuation? 3. What test results did the surface achieve at the specified fall requirement? 4. How long is my surface guaranteed to meet the F1292-04 standard? 5. How long is my surface guaranteed against defects in material and workmanship? 6. What type of surface is going to provide the best value equation over the long term? Endura from Advanced Ground Care EnvyLawn Environmental Molding Concepts Nebraska Rubber Innovations Abacus Sports Installations |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For Christian School Products, Reviews And Resources Visit The Christian School Products Website |